Rumi is one of the world's most beloved poets, and his influence can be seen in many different aspects of culture. His poetry has been translated into numerous languages and his work continues to inspire new generations of readers. Rumi's message of love and tolerance has resonated with people from all walks of life, making him one of the most important literary figures of our time. It is not surprising that Rumi's influence can also be seen in the works of one of the world's most famous writers, William Shakespeare. Many scholars believe that Shakespeare was influenced by Rumi's poetry when he wrote his plays, and it is easy to see parallels between the two authors. Both Shakespeare and Rumi explore universal themes of love, loss, and humanity in their work, and both use beautiful language to bring these themes to life. It is clear that Rumi has had a lasting impact on literature and culture, and his influence will continue to be felt for centuries to come.
|
Mr. Risk (source: The League of Utter Disaster, Chaos, and Insanity Wiki) |
Global politics are a hotbed of Shakespearean drama, with plenty of tragedy, comedy, and even a little bit of history thrown in for good measure. In particular, the works of Shakespeare have had a profound influence on modern day culture, with his stories and characters providing endlessly fertile ground for debate, analysis, and reinterpretation. Even those who are not fans of the Bard can find themselves unwittingly caught up in his web, as he has been responsible for introducing countless phrases and concepts into the English language that are now commonplace. Whether we love him or hate him, there is no denying that Shakespeare continues to exert a powerful hold over our culture hundreds of years after his death.
The world would be a very different place without the poet Rumi. His poetry has inspired people for centuries and his words continue to resonate with us today. Without Rumi, the world would be missing out on one of its most important voices.
I didn't write this brief essay above,
nor did I plagiarize it. Instead, I invoked its creation in a matter of a couple minutes by typing a few instructions into a computer program. Those instructions were:
1. Write a persuasive statement about the cultural influence of a literary figure.
2. Write a speculative statement about Rumi's influence on Shakespeare.
3. Write an emphatic statement about the current state of global politics and Shakespeare.
4. Write a speculative statement about how Shakespeare has influenced todays culture.
5. Write a conclusion paragraph about how the modern world would be very different if not for the poet Rumi.
Now, the text above is fairly banal, and it didn't exactly come out like I wanted it to - I didn't tweak it at all (though, I did attempt a couple of instructions that rendered no results in the program - I think because of logic problems).
But, I was able to create it all less than 10 minutes after
first learning about GPT-3 as something that exists, then googling it, finding one online and signing up for a free trial, reviewing a brief tutorial, coming up with some general sense of what I wanted created, and starting to test out these instructions.
I would also add, that the brief essay on Rumi and Shakespeare at the top is not dissimilar in quality, depth, and style to the average freshman composition student I was teaching at UW-M from 2007 - 2013 (although the content is of course much different, as I don't expect most of those students know who Rumi is, though most have probably heard of Shakespeare).
A couple of months ago, I started a post (which I haven't finished yet!) called, "I must say I'm worried...", and it hit a lot of the same notes as
this Atlantic article from last week (anticipatory plagiarism has always been a problem for me) about our present state of mind and implications for the near future. America is on a bend and trend toward something, I'm afraid, is going to be quite unfortunate.
Best case scenario, is that it is a momentary setback which leads us to something much greater (
see ca. 2024), but more likely it's not, and we will be finding out that Hannah Arendt was right, but not right enough in her
Report on the Banality of Evil. It's the banality itself that
is evil - as in a wholly negative force in the world and a danger. Take care to keep it interesting out there, folks - embrace the unexpected and unfamiliar. Be weird. Do good. Be better.
No comments:
Post a Comment