24 February 2008
and the award goes to...
While watching the Oscars tonight (and having re-accrued much of my film & camera collection) i'm struck first, by how few movies i see anymore... (netflix, you're taking me for one this last year or so) I'm making my Oscar choices based on how much i wanted to see the movies this year, rather than any real sense of ... deservation...
Bravo Jon Stewart, on handing the gal from Once the chance to give her speech after the commercial break. And bravo Jon Stewart on not needing to go for a whole 'production' for the opening sequence. I think there's much value to getting an East-Coaster (read non-Californian for all intents & purposes) to host the Oscars... Conan, Ellen, Jon Stewart, hell, even Dave work this show in a way that Billy Crystal & Steve Martin were never able to...
Best this, best that... who really cares who we decide the best is today... It's hard for us to really keep much stock in what they decide today is the 'best' of anything... A best documentary award (which admittedly, i've seen none of the nominees) doesn't go to the film about Iraq (so cliche) or the film about healthcare in America (so Hillary), but the one about Afghanistan... the War we forgot we were in... lovely
And it's over... You know what i could really use. Is some after-Oscars commentary (i'm thinking Slavoj Zizek, Harriet Klausner & John Madden) sitting around a plastic table discussing who, in fact, won, who didn't... They could discuss how the filmmakers could have made the movies differently (better) if they wanted to win the award.
John Madden: Maybe if Sweeny Todd had gone with less singing, more serious themes, less Johnny Depp, they really might have had a shot this year.
Zizek: The problem a film work like Juno finds itself in, is the paradigm (pronounced pear-a-dig-m) of the violence and sex American-readWestern-culture finds itself drowning in is--
Harriet Klausner: I loved it. just loved it.
Madden: Which one?
Klausner: It was amazing, working on so many levels. Truly deep.
Zizek: Paradigm (pair-a-dig-em)
Klausner: Never have i seen a year of better Oscar contenders.
Madden: What happens, is the name of the film or actor that currently resides in the envelope these hosts, er presenters... these big stars are holding, the names in the envelopes, those guys will be the eventual winners... Once they've got that envelope, you know, barring a huge comeback of some kind, you've got your winner right there...
Klausner: Mr. Madden, please put your pants back on...
Zizek: (exit, pursued by a bear)
It seems like this'd make more sense to most people...
19 February 2008
Voting Day!!!
Janis Ringhand
WisconsinCandidate for Rock County Board - District 1 (Open Seat)
Janis has been a member of our farm team since 2005 and, in 2006, she was a Progressive Majority candidate for the State House in the 80th Assembly District. Despite hard work and a valiant effort on her part, she came up short by less than 200 votes. Now, Janis is running for an open seat on the Rock County Board. Janis is a former mayor of Evansville and, if elected, she will hold a progressive seat in one of the more conservative parts of the county.
Click here to support and learn more about Janis.
Katie Kusnasik
WisconsinCandidate for Rock County Board - District 29 (Challenger)
Katie Kusnasik is challenging a conservative member of the Rock County Board as part of a strategy to create a progressive majority in the next two election cycles. She is currently a legislative assistant to progressive Assembly Representative Michael Sheridan and specializes in constituent relationships. Katie is supported by United Auto Workers and the local Labor Council. Katie has attended training by Progressive Majority and this is her first run for public office.
Click here to support and learn more about Katie.

18 February 2008
this is not a pipe
17 February 2008
Toward a Poetic Culture
15 February 2008
Constructive Games

One of the primary concerns of Oulipo is this idea of creating a set of arbitrary rules around your art. With If On a Winter’s Night a Traveler you’ve got a single sentence/poem that will make up the chapter titles and a host of other constrictions cataloged elsewhere. Stephen King says about writing fiction that a lot of great storytelling comes from the question, “What If?” and Oulipo must have anticipatorily plagiarized this idea, creating art that says, “what if we make a _________ that only _________?”
In my introductory creative writing class in college, an introduction of the textbook suggested that writing (and I would say just art generally) should be something akin to playing tennis, rather than solely the realm of ‘professionals.’ “I write” (or make art) wouldn’t mean you necessarily do so well (in the same way that “I play tennis” in no way gives me delusions that I could be a professional tennis player {though I’m sure I could have, had my high school had a team}). I wonder if this isn’t somewhat what Oulipo is after, democratizing art creation, making art creation possible for everyone (by doing creative writing exercises as a jumping off point). That being said, those in the actual Oulipo movement likely don’t want everyone to necessarily display all of their Oulipian art (just as my backhand slice should remain largely unseen).
What this notion of democratizing art might do, though, is create a lot of ‘potential art’. The more bad art being made out there and the more our culture becomes one that encourages participation in art creation, the more opportunity there is for great outside art to actually be discovered.
I feel as though I have strayed somewhat from my initial thought with this post… I was going to say something about the idea of the difference between rules and laws, rules being arbitrary and artificial, while laws theoretically come from moral or ethical considerations. Also the difference that you can’t actually break a rule (this notion is one of Baudrillard’s, I think), because once you do, you’re no longer playing the game, strictly speaking. Whereas a law can be broken (ethical and moral standards can change, which should force laws to change), and sometimes should be broken in order to line them up with the changing moral/ethical standards. You can change the rules of the game (say, you get to use doubles lines when we play tennis), but then you’re playing a slightly different game (so you still didn’t beat me at tennis, really).
14 February 2008
07 February 2008
Someone Who actually posts...
It's about sundry academic-y things...
enjoy