Occasionally, I’ll go through spells where I walk everywhere with my iPod listening to music. I listen to it on the bus (instead of reading) and I switch from playlist to playlist depending on my mood and occasionally dig through my library for ‘the perfect’ song for a particular moment (like the Counting Crows’ “
This (possibly invented) phenomenon makes me wonder about the iPod’s possible effects on musical composition and invention. I’m thinking about 13-19 years down the road when a generation of young musicians that has grown up in an iPod inundated world and wondering what might be the effect on music creation. If it’s true that the ability to imagine music is interrupted by the ability to always be able to hear music, what then becomes of the musical imagination? Musical composition is always at least partly musical derivation. But by being constantly presented with the musical actuality, does the imagined music (and thereby its derivations) suffer? Is the prevalence of musical sampling as a new musical art form a result of the iPod (and earlier the Walkman) age? What might this mean for future musical creativity (if anything)?
2 comments:
Conversely, does the constant exposure to music make it easier to compose? I'm thinking here of the idea that constant exposure to writing (for example) somehow gets us expertise. Also, the more you write (and read) the better you get; the more music you listen to, the more you understand how it works...
As a VERY BAD musician, I'm not sure that this analogy directly applies. But it could be something to think about.
I love this idea. I wish I had thought of it! :)
Yeah, but i think the danger is to assume that quantity of input (or practice) makes for better quality. More reading (or writing) doesn't always make for better writing...
If, for instance, you always read the exact same type of writing (bad mystery novels or salon.com articles) your ability to write like that might improve, but your overall writing ability probably won't...
Quantity is good (and i'm not saying that quality is better), but variation in that quantity is vital & that's what the radio, say, can give us that an iPod needn't...
Post a Comment